A mediator’s style is not the same for all cases. As each case is unique and every mediator has its own strengths and weaknesses, it is essential to select the most suitable mediator for your particular situation.
The purpose of mediation is to help the parties come to the best possible resolution according to their preferences in order to determine the most appropriate mediator for the case and the parties can reach the most beneficial outcome for everyone who is involved.
The particular dynamics of each case and the people are bound to influence the choice of the right mediator. Certain parties can benefit from a stern mediator, and others would be better served by a calming mediator. If you want a stern mediator to solve land-related issues then you can visit https://www.boileaucs.com/land-rights for land rights mediation.
Image source: Google
Being mindful of the entire team who are involved in the dispute – including the parties and their attorney is vital to determine the best mediator for a quick and fair settlement.
The nature of the dispute could determine if a mediator’s specific style is suitable. A mediator using an evaluative approach is an impartial and objective evaluator, chipping off the weak points of both sides and pushing parties to find a common ground.
If a case involves complicated legal aspects or is related to an extremely specific aspect of the law, it could be preferential to select a mediator who has subject matter knowledge.
For instance, if a dispute involves patent law an expert mediator in patent law is more knowledgeable about the law that is at issue and better equipped to assist both parties to discover solutions that can be amicably resolved in the event of a disagreement.